X10 Firecracker Device for USB

Have an idea for a new feature? Voice your opinion here.
Post Reply
Dunesie
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 12:03 am

X10 Firecracker Device for USB

Post by Dunesie »

I recently purchased a load of X10 stuff and the Firecracker interface is USB. How soon will an HB USB haredware interface be available?
ScottBot
Site Admin
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:46 pm
Location: Georgia (USA)
Contact:

Post by ScottBot »

The standard 'Firecracker' is a serial port device (CM17A). Just to confuse me, X10 also has a CM19A USB attached device that they also call a 'Firecracker'. I believe that you are referring to the CM19A.



Unfortunately, I have not been able to find any published protocol specification for the CM19a. If you can find a reference to the spec, let me know and I'll look into it.
Scott
Dunesie
Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 12:03 am

X10 USB

Post by Dunesie »

I saw in a related X10 post that somebody recommended the Powerlinc USB interface instead of the CM11. Since the Powerlinc doesn't have a memory, what is the difference between using a serial port Firecracker vs. the USB Powerlinc? Which interface do you consider to be more reliable? I'm new to X10 and I'm trying to get some automation going.
ScottBot
Site Admin
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:46 pm
Location: Georgia (USA)
Contact:

Post by ScottBot »

I can't speak much about the CM19a (USB version) Firecracker, since I've never had one.



However, the CM17A (serial Firecracker) is very limited in a number of ways. It works in conjunction with an X10 RF transceiver. This means that you are limited to a single house code (only 16 devices) for all of your X10 needs. It is also one-way (at least the HouseBot plugin works that way).



The USB Powerlink is a much superior device. It has logic to handle noisy lines that a standard RF transceiver does not have.



I'm no X10 expert, but that's my 2 cents.
Scott
Post Reply